Margin at the matter level
Revenue against the real cost of delivery — timekeeper cost rates, write-downs, and unbilled effort — so you can see which matters, clients, and practice groups actually fund the firm.
Legal practice reporting
A Power BI law firm matter profitability dashboard: margin per matter, billing and collection realization rates, timekeeper utilization, WIP, and aged AR in one view built on your billing system. A senior US-based engineer builds it, secures it by partner, and keeps it refreshing. Most builds in 3–5 business days.
Representative dashboard — sample data
Where the money actually goes
Most firms can quote billable hours by memory and cannot say which matters made money. The gap between standard value, billed value, and cash collected is where firm profitability lives, and it is spread across time entries, invoices, write-downs, and receipts that no single report joins up. A matter profitability dashboard closes that gap one matter at a time: margin per matter after timekeeper cost, realization rates from standard to billed to collected, utilization of the people who worked it, WIP still unbilled, and aged AR still unpaid.
We build that join. One model over your billing system rolls matter-level margin up to client, practice group, and firm, alongside billing and collection realization, timekeeper utilization, WIP age, and receivables risk — secured so each partner sees their own book and the managing partner sees the firm. It is the same custom Power BI dashboard development we do for other sectors, shaped around how law firms bill; firms that also want to see the layout first can browse our Power BI dashboard examples by industry, and CPA practices tracking the same realization and WIP measures should see Power BI for accounting firms.
What we build for firms
Buy a block of prepaid Flex hours and, if you're unhappy within the first 4 hours, we refund you in full — no questions asked. Hours are deducted only for work you've reviewed and approved, there's no project minimum, and your banked hours never expire.
Why firms call us
You send the request; a senior engineer models your time, billing, and receipts around how your firm compensates people.
Revenue against the real cost of delivery — timekeeper cost rates, write-downs, and unbilled effort — so you can see which matters, clients, and practice groups actually fund the firm.
Billing realization and collection realization tracked separately, so a partner who bills at standard but collects at seventy cents is visible before the write-off lands at year end.
Origination, working, and responsible-attorney credit modeled as separate lenses on the same revenue, so comp season is a toggle in the report rather than three competing spreadsheets.
Row-level security means one report for the whole firm: partners see their matters, group heads see their group, and administrators see everything — enforced in the model, not by emailing different files.
Flat fees, capped fees, and contingency matters compared against actual effort, giving an effective hourly rate per matter instead of a fee that only looks profitable until the hours are counted.
Four things decide it: the rate actually collected, the hours actually needed, who did the work, and how long the money took to arrive. A profitability model has to carry all four — standard value, billed value, cash receipts, timekeeper cost, and the dates between them — or it will flatter partners whose bills are large and slow.
Firms are often surprised by which matters emerge as weak. High-rate work delivered largely by partners can carry less margin than mid-rate work leveraged across associates, and a client who pays at 120 days can consume more working capital than their fees justify. Those conclusions only appear when time, billing, and receipts sit in one model with consistent definitions — see Power BI data modeling and DAX for how those measures are built.
Here is where the standard reporting in a legal billing platform stops and where the dashboard we build picks up — the same time entries and invoices, made historical, comparable, and secured.
| Question | Typical billing system limitation | Power BI dashboard version |
|---|---|---|
| Matter profitability | Fees billed, without delivery cost | Margin after timekeeper cost, write-downs, and unbilled effort |
| Realization | One blended figure per period | Billing and collection realization by partner, client, and matter type |
| Utilization | Billable hours against a target | Billable, non-billable, leverage, and capacity by timekeeper |
| WIP | Current balance list | Aged WIP, movement over time, matters breaching billing policy |
| Receivables | Aging snapshot | Aged AR with days-to-pay trend and client risk flags |
| Compensation credit | Single credit rule, exported to spreadsheets | Origination, working, and responsible credit as switchable views |
Time entries, matters, clients, invoices, write-downs, receipts, and timekeeper rates come from your practice management or billing platform. Extraction depends on the system: an API, a reportable database, or a scheduled export. We confirm the method for your platform in the scope estimate before any hours are used. Clio is the most common platform we see, and because it has no native Power BI connector we build from its API or scheduled exports — see how we approach a Clio Power BI dashboard for the specifics.
Legal software varies more than most sectors. Cloud platforms often expose a usable API; established on-premises systems usually offer database access instead; a few realistically support only scheduled exports. All three can produce dependable reporting, but the design differs, so we would rather establish that up front than discover it mid-build. Structurally the model is a straightforward star schema — Microsoft's guidance on star schema design in Power BI (opens in new tab) describes the pattern we follow, with time entries and invoices as facts and matter, client, timekeeper, and date as dimensions.
With row-level security in the semantic model. Each user is mapped to the matters, practice groups, or offices they may see, and every visual respects it automatically. One report serves the whole firm, which removes the version drift that comes from maintaining a separate file per partner.
Firms usually want three tiers: partners see their own matters and originations, practice-group heads see their group, and the managing partner and firm administrator see everything. That is configured once and tested against real accounts before go-live. Our guide to setting up row-level security covers the configuration, and if trust or IOLTA balances are in scope we treat them as read-only reporting only — the dashboard never initiates or alters a transaction.
You buy prepaid Flex hours that never expire: Starter 20h at $125/hr ($2,500), Growth 40h at $115/hr ($4,600), or Power 80h at $100/hr ($8,000). A first profitability and realization build typically fits inside one block, and most builds ship in 3–5 business days once you approve the scope estimate.
Traditional Power BI firms charge $175–250/hr, set project minimums, want $10K+ to start, let unused hours expire, and don't begin for 4–6 weeks. Flex Support is $100–125/hr, no minimums, banked hours that never expire, and a start this week. Hours deduct only for approved work. See how prepaid Flex hours work, or our affordable Power BI consulting page for the full comparison.
Managing partners, firm administrators, and legal finance directors at firms without an in-house BI team. For utilization-driven practices outside law, see Power BI for professional services; if your firm's accounting sits in QuickBooks or Xero, our QuickBooks and Xero dashboards cover the ledger side.
The ideal fit is a firm of roughly five to a hundred timekeepers — big enough that partner-level reporting is a real monthly job, small enough that a dedicated analyst is hard to justify. It also suits firms whose existing reporting was built by someone who has since left, and firms preparing for a compensation review that needs numbers everyone can trust. Contact is form-only — send your request and we'll reply with a scope estimate.
business days, typical
hours, never expire
own everything
A first profitability build usually fits inside one Flex block, and hours deduct only for work you approve. See Flex pricing →
How it works
Tell us your billing platform, how your firm defines realization and credit, and who should see what. We reply with a scope and hours estimate before any work begins — hours deduct only for builds you approve.
A senior US-based engineer builds the model over time, billing, and receipts, writes the DAX for realization and margin, configures row-level security, and reconciles totals to your system — typically 3–5 business days.
We publish to your workspace, set overnight refresh so figures are current each morning, and hand over the model and credentials. You own everything; we keep it healthy from your banked hours.
Representative perspective
We knew our billable hours to the decimal and could not tell you which practice group made money. Seeing margin after cost and write-downs changed how we staffed two of our biggest clients.Managing partner, mid-size litigation firm
Representative perspective
Comp season used to run on three spreadsheets that never agreed. One model with origination and working credit as separate views ended most of the argument before it started.Firm administrator, multi-office practice
Tell us your billing platform and how your firm defines realization. We'll scope the task and tell you the hours before any work begins — drawn from prepaid Flex hours that never expire, with no project minimums and no obligation.
FAQ
Any practice management or billing platform that exposes an API, a reportable database, or a scheduled export. Cloud and on-premises systems differ enormously in what they allow, so we confirm the extraction method for your specific platform in the scope estimate before any hours are used.
As separate, switchable views of the same revenue. Compensation arguments usually come from mixing them, so we model origination credit, working credit, and responsible-attorney credit independently, then let the report toggle between them without changing a single underlying number.
Yes. Row-level security filters the model by the signed-in user, so a partner sees their matters and originations while the managing partner and administrator see the firm. It is enforced on every visual in the model rather than by maintaining separate report files.
Only as read-only reporting, and only if you ask for it. A dashboard reports balances and movement; it never initiates or alters a transaction. Trust reconciliation remains your firm's process and your accounting system's record, exactly as your bar rules require.
Yes, and flat-fee and contingency work is where profitability reporting earns its keep. We model budgeted versus actual effort against the fee, so you see effective hourly rate and margin per matter rather than assuming a flat fee behaves like billable hours.
Book a free demo
Tell us the task. We scope it, you approve, and a senior consultant delivers — typically in 3–5 business days. Prepaid hours that never expire.
The fastest way to reach us is the form — tell us the task and we'll reply within one business day.